There's time for structured work, where everyone has the same end product.
And there's time for open ended art. The kids painted using cotton buds today. I think it's beautiful :)
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Letter writing
I purchased my first apple app today...Letter School! It's educational, so it's ok. Haha. I downloaded the lite version first and let my students try it and they absolutely love it. Even I look forward to see what the animation will be. So I decided to buy the full version. It only costs 3 dollars, which is about RM9, and I think it's a good buy. I really believe that this is the new era of education and we must move forward and change our ways of teaching. This is definitely a really really fun way of learning how to write.
Which brings me to another point...how strictly should we follow the rules of letter formation? I realized that different apps sometimes show different letter formation, eg. when writing letter d, do you start with the line or start at the curve? What I learnt in college is the proper way is that you start at the curve.
Some books teach two separate strokes for a letter, eg. for letter a, you write the c first, and then lift up your pencil and draw the straight line, whereas what I learnt in college is that you do not lift up the pencil when writing.
When my lil bro saw my playing the app, he said, 'eh like that one meh? I write another way.' He writes capital letter E with the vertical line down first, then the bottom horizontal line then the top horizontal line, and finally the middle horizontal line.
At first I thought, yer, your teachers didn't teach you one meh. But then i pondered..does it matter??
Does it matter which 'y' you use? The curvy one? Or the straight one? Is one wrong and the other right? At the end of the day, children are bound to see both in words around them.
Does it matter whether you lift up your pencil or not? Some teachers say its easier for children to learn when it's in two strokes. At the end of the day, when children begin to write, they will write faster and naturally they will stop lifting up the pencil, right?
If they do not catch the proper formation, so what? In the end, you will still be able to see the letter, right? And isn't that the purpose of writing?
Of course, I will teach the 'proper' way of writing letters, but sometimes, if they lift up their pencil and write the letter in two strokes, I just close one eye. I think the children have more important things to do.
Which brings me to another point...how strictly should we follow the rules of letter formation? I realized that different apps sometimes show different letter formation, eg. when writing letter d, do you start with the line or start at the curve? What I learnt in college is the proper way is that you start at the curve.
Some books teach two separate strokes for a letter, eg. for letter a, you write the c first, and then lift up your pencil and draw the straight line, whereas what I learnt in college is that you do not lift up the pencil when writing.
When my lil bro saw my playing the app, he said, 'eh like that one meh? I write another way.' He writes capital letter E with the vertical line down first, then the bottom horizontal line then the top horizontal line, and finally the middle horizontal line.
At first I thought, yer, your teachers didn't teach you one meh. But then i pondered..does it matter??
Does it matter which 'y' you use? The curvy one? Or the straight one? Is one wrong and the other right? At the end of the day, children are bound to see both in words around them.
Does it matter whether you lift up your pencil or not? Some teachers say its easier for children to learn when it's in two strokes. At the end of the day, when children begin to write, they will write faster and naturally they will stop lifting up the pencil, right?
If they do not catch the proper formation, so what? In the end, you will still be able to see the letter, right? And isn't that the purpose of writing?
Of course, I will teach the 'proper' way of writing letters, but sometimes, if they lift up their pencil and write the letter in two strokes, I just close one eye. I think the children have more important things to do.
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Laws of a Teacher
Stop growing today,
Stop teaching tomorrow.
Teaching that impacts is not head to head,
But Heart to Heart.
Old thinking: Practice makes Perfect
New thinking: Well Guided Practice Makes Perfect
Old thinking: Experience is the best teacher
New thinking: Properly evaluated experience is the Best Teacher
Old thinking: We learn by Doing
New thinking: We learn by Doing the Right Things
Stop teaching tomorrow.
Teaching that impacts is not head to head,
But Heart to Heart.
Old thinking: Practice makes Perfect
New thinking: Well Guided Practice Makes Perfect
Old thinking: Experience is the best teacher
New thinking: Properly evaluated experience is the Best Teacher
Old thinking: We learn by Doing
New thinking: We learn by Doing the Right Things
Kid-spiration
Children are not just blank pieces of paper, but also painters: having the ability to learn & have plenty of ideas!
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Creativity
In a school which I teach (Shall not mention which), I was required to write lesson plan for my arts & crafts lesson. I could not think of any objectives for my lesson. (Objectives have to start with "at the end of the lesson, children should be able to..." and the assessment has to be linked: "children are assessed on their ability to...") I was at a lost. My objective was to let them just explore and have fun! That's it!!
Then I was told, the objective of an arts and crafts lesson is to let children train their fine motor skills. Through pasting and painting. they train their fine motor skills. I agree that through arts and crafts, children develop their fine motor skills, but shouldn't the MAIN objective be focused on creativity? Do they need to be assessed on creativity?? Hello, children are waaaaaaay more creative than you, and it is these kind of highly structured close ended "ART" that we prepare that is squashing their creativity.
http://www.janetlansbury.com/2010/04/a-childs-creativity-how-i-learned-to-shut-up/
Learn to shut up, adults.
Just venting.
P/S: I have a huge stack of blank paper in class for children to JUST DRAW ANYTHING. They draw little lines and circles and can tell me what they've drawn. I label their artwork. And they love it! :)
Then I was told, the objective of an arts and crafts lesson is to let children train their fine motor skills. Through pasting and painting. they train their fine motor skills. I agree that through arts and crafts, children develop their fine motor skills, but shouldn't the MAIN objective be focused on creativity? Do they need to be assessed on creativity?? Hello, children are waaaaaaay more creative than you, and it is these kind of highly structured close ended "ART" that we prepare that is squashing their creativity.
http://www.janetlansbury.com/2010/04/a-childs-creativity-how-i-learned-to-shut-up/
Learn to shut up, adults.
Just venting.
P/S: I have a huge stack of blank paper in class for children to JUST DRAW ANYTHING. They draw little lines and circles and can tell me what they've drawn. I label their artwork. And they love it! :)
Thursday, February 28, 2013
A Bit More Settled
My boyfriend/fiance won't be happy to read this (jealous):
I've fallen in love with 16 lil people :-)
I've been so busy this past 2 months with training, lesson planning, observation reports, theme boards, preparation of materials... And now that I am a bit more settled at work, I am starting to plan my wedding! (I consider wedding planning my new hobby haha)
Proof of my busy-ness: I've only ready 1 book so far. ONE! UNO! (Last year I read more than 30 books) It was a great book: Bringing Up Bébé. It's about how French parenting differs from American parenting.
I shall try to write about it when I have time, but for now, I've got some lessons to plan!
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
Direct teaching? Or letting children explore?
MIT professor Laura Schulz, her graduate student
Elizabeth Bonawitz, and their colleagues looked at how 4-year-olds
learned about a new toy with four tubes. Each tube could do something
interesting: If you pulled on one tube it squeaked, if you looked inside
another tube you found a hidden mirror, and so on.
For one group of children, the experimenter said: "I just found this toy!" As she brought out the toy, she pulled the first tube, as if by accident, and it squeaked. She acted surprised ("Huh! Did you see that? Let me try to do that!") and pulled the tube again to make it squeak a second time.
With the other children, the experimenter acted more like a teacher. She said, "I'm going to show you how my toy works. Watch this!" and deliberately made the tube squeak. Then she left both groups of children alone to play with the toy.
For one group of children, the experimenter said: "I just found this toy!" As she brought out the toy, she pulled the first tube, as if by accident, and it squeaked. She acted surprised ("Huh! Did you see that? Let me try to do that!") and pulled the tube again to make it squeak a second time.
With the other children, the experimenter acted more like a teacher. She said, "I'm going to show you how my toy works. Watch this!" and deliberately made the tube squeak. Then she left both groups of children alone to play with the toy.
All of the children pulled the first tube to make it squeak. The
question was whether they would also learn about the other things the
toy could do. The children from the first group played with the toy
longer and discovered more of its "hidden" features than those in the
second group. In other words, direct instruction made the children less
curious and less likely to discover new information.
extracted from http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2011/03/why_preschool_shouldnt_be_like_school.html
extracted from http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2011/03/why_preschool_shouldnt_be_like_school.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
